Purchase of Development Rights
(PDR), Who Benefits
Dissent
8/9/09
This dissent is regarding Grand Rapids Press Article of 7/22/2009 by Rick
Wilson: Despite Budget Crunch, Kent County officials near agreement on
farmland preservation.
I am writing this article as a former County Commissioner and Supporter of
Purchase of Development Rights but not for Kent County to fund Purchase of
Development Rights (PDR). I think that expanding the grant program will
continue to be an effective tool. It is a fact that the cities in this
county contribute approximately 70% of general fund revenue through property
taxes, as people that live in the city of Grand Rapids I want to know how
this program is going to benefit city dwellers. Some of the wealthiest
farmers in the Area will be subsidized to not develop their land under these
conditions. This program will create an urban growth boundary. As a tax
paying citizen I can understand planned growth and the need to take waste
and speculation out of the axiom, however, the question becomes who is kept
out and how does this affect the city that I live in. Even with the public
helping to pay for this we will not have access to hunting, fishing and
sight seeing on these properties. This growth boundary takes away from
cities and limits creative activity for city dwellers to have places to go
for small “get a ways.” Some cities are a hot bed for criminal activity and
some communities are disproportionately represented in the crime statistics
and jails and prisons. What does this program do to help deal with the
disproportionate factors of criminal activity that comes from a community is
a powder keg because of lack of jobs and places to go and things to do. The
proper use of land is a powerful tool in the development of infrastructure
in our communities; planned development is the way to go. But by defacto
certain groups are left out of the planning process. We in the city of Grand
Rapids have been trying to build a youth center, through the Concerned
Citizens’ Council, for the past 10 years, various people and representatives
have approached Kent County Government for financial support to help in this
venture and as county tax payers we have been turned down flatly. The
preservation and education of our children is our major growth industry. We
don’t need to continue to send out youth to jail and prison in a
disproportionate manner in this county.
W. Paul Mayhue
Former Kent County Commissioner
16th District